It is often the case that an office solution is the right one for a firm for a plethora of diverse reasons. This means that the accommodation or alternative solution is rated according to several criteria before the decision to use it is made. Of course, the cost-benefit analysis performed may involve a mixture of quantifiable and subjective factors. This is actually probably the best way to proceed because some of the factors which impinge upon the performance of a firm are very hard to pin down in a numerical format.

An example can serve to illustrate the point. When a firm is seeking to use a virtual solution there are various considerations which its management will undoubtedly reflect on. The cost is obviously something which will be focused on. The features of the service will be thought about in terms of their relevance. Furthermore, access to other facilities may be on the list of factors which ultimately shape the decision. In addition to these three salient factors, some reassurance with regard to quality should be sought. It might be that client testimonials are looked at or customer service awards considered.

One aspect of the decision which is sometimes neglected is the physical location of the office solution. Due to the fact that the firm may be working from somewhere else, it is sometimes forgotten that external perceptions of the firm will partly be shaped by the precise address of the office solution being used. A virtual office around West End cultural amenities could prove to be a useful asset.